To begin, please understand that data regarding AESIs (adverse events of special interest) expressed in this FOIA document 5.3.6 spanning 9 pages are not simply events that occurred after receipt of the Pfizer vaccine. Let me explain: The list of adverse events in document 5.3.6 acts as a register that houses data from both western and eastern hemispheres
For many of us, the industry of "health care" is oxymoronic and has been for decades and eons. The officials of said industry have been for sale for as long as there have been dollars to buy them, and the need to pay them for endorsements of dangerous, life threatening products. If given plausible deniability, most Docs are gonna take the check and worry about the "science" after the last check clears. "More Doctors smoke Camel than any other brand!" leads to "Well, at the time, we didn't know WITH CERTAINTY that smoking was bad for you. Sorry."
The only difference between "Have a smoke, you'll feel better" and "Have a vax or two, you'll live longer" is scale.
For many of us, the industry of "health care" is oxymoronic and has been for decades and eons. The officials of said industry have been for sale for as long as there have been dollars to buy them, and the need to pay them for endorsements of dangerous, life threatening products. If given plausible deniability, most Docs are gonna take the check and worry about the "science" after the last check clears. "More Doctors smoke Camel than any other brand!" leads to "Well, at the time, we didn't know WITH CERTAINTY that smoking was bad for you. Sorry."
The only difference between "Have a smoke, you'll feel better" and "Have a vax or two, you'll live longer" is scale.