To begin, please understand that data regarding AESIs (adverse events of special interest) expressed in this FOIA document 5.3.6 spanning 9 pages are not simply events that occurred after receipt of the Pfizer vaccine. Let me explain:
The list of adverse events in document 5.3.6 acts as a register that houses data from both western and eastern hemispheres
Essentially, some of the AESIs listed were experienced after covid vaccination, but others were not and effects were seen after receipt of other vaccines
That said, this list was a conglomerate of eastern and western health agency data created as a tool for practicing clinicians to identify covid vaccine adverse events in their patients and as a key for public health professionals. That said, Brighton Collaboration (SPEAC), ACCESS protocol, US CDC (preliminary list of AESI for VAERS surveillance), MHRA (unpublished guideline) helped construct the aforementioned list.
Now, let’s begin with some history. Specifically, how these Pfizer documents came into the hands of the public.
How it began
A FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) lawsuit was filed by a Texas law firm associated with a man named Aaron Siri against the FDA for the release of Pfizer vaccine data. The court docket below reveals a filing date of 1/6/22. Scroll down further to read the particulars.
Or click here to read the full breakdown of the above pictured court docket👇 :
Demands from the FOIA lawsuit explained & subsequent ruling
Or click here to read the full breakdown of the above pictured text👇 :
Pfizer gets directly involved
Just so it’s clear, the original lawsuit was between a Texas law firm and the FDA. However, soon after the judge ordered FDA to produce 55k documents per month, Pfizer got directly involved. See the next court docket on this below.
Click here to read my full breakdown of this article👇 :
Pfizer requests the court to prevent the release of certain vaccine documents
Click here to read my full breakdown of this article👇 :
Pfizer vaccine document 5.3.6
Below is a snippet from the beginning of the document titled 5.3.6 CUMULATIVE ANALYSIS OF POST-AUTHORIZATION ADVERSE EVENT REPORTS OF PF-07302048 (BNT162B2) RECEIVED THROUGH 28-FEB-2021. As you can see from the image below, crucial information was redacted, so an accurate assessment on the prevalence of adverse events can’t be made, only speculated. (b) (4) indicates redacted info.
As indicated beneath, the exact number of doses shipped was redacted. That evidenced by (b) (4) mark.
Total number of adverse events was 42,086, of which, only 25,379 were medically confirmed.
Immediately under this text are the categories of adverse events seen during the period in question from document 5.3.6 : December 1st 2020- February 28th 2021.
As you can see underneath here, the overwhelming majority of events were general disorders like pyrexia (fever), fatigue, chills, vaccination site pain, tiredness, asthenia (abnormal weakness), etc. But there’s more……
Cardiovascular AESIs
Cardiovascular events after vaccination totaled 1,403 of which 241 were medically confirmed. 946 were serious cases, some warranting hospitalization, and ICU admission. However, Pfizer claimed these events didn’t substantially exceed baseline rates experienced by the general public that didn’t receive covid vaccines. However, that’s likely due to the fact there are not enough data to assess. As you can see from more recent studies, many cardiovascular events occur after vaccination like pulmonary embolism, cerebral venous thrombosis (blood clot in the brain), and heart attack caused by released plaque migrating to the coronary arteries.
Immune-Mediated/Autoimmune AESIs
Interestingly, myo/pericarditis can be seen below and are listed as immune mediated events occurring after vaccination. Moreover, of 1050 immune AESIs, 780 were serious, 12 fatal, and 22 resolved from the acute phase and turned into a chronic ongoing condition for x amount of weeks/months (data doesn’t specify length of sequelae).
Thromboembolic AESIs
As highlighted, there were 151 cases of TEs (thrombotic events) of which 111 were medically confirmed. It should be noted, most events occurred within 24 hours after vaccination or up to 28 days after. Finally, 18 cases of all thrombotic events were fatal, 6 resolved with ongoing symptoms, and 49 did not resolve completely (the incomplete resolution is likely due to the fact this data only followed affected individuals for a few months and said issues can take longer to heal).
9 Pages of vaccine adverse events
As previously explained, the wall of adverse events listed below are not exclusive to the Pfizer vaccine. Essentially, they are a list of side effects that were observed after either covid vaccination or from receipt of other vaccines. So as you can see, this list serves as a guide for practicing clinicians like myself and other’s who are direct patient facing, specifically, MDs, PAs, NPs, RNs, etc. It reminds us what could happen after COVID vaccination. Nevertheless, some important points needs to be explored.
The fact is, many of the AESIs listed below were seen after administration of Pfizer’s BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine and that cannot be denied. The post market surveillance from this document reveals that mRNA vaccine side effects are real and can be severe and even fatal.
This document (5.3.6) serves as a reminder that nothing in life comes without consequence. Regrettably, many media outlets underplayed the potential severity of said side effects from covid vaccines by making statements like, “Pfizer is safe and effective”. The correct statement would have been, “The Pfizer vaccine like anything in this world does have side effects, many of which are mild, but less commonly, severe”. That said, in light of the dishonesty, people have not been able to appropriately reason through risk-benefit analysis as they were not being properly informed.
As a side note, at best, most drugs or treatments are no better than 18% effective and have indirect consequences. A good example of this are statin drugs. They are defined as “effective” because taking them correlates with a lower incidence of negative heart related events. Sadly, the aforementioned 18% implies there can be off-target effects because the drug’s mechanism of action could indirectly off-balance other bodily systems. The same story is true for vaccines, there simply must be side effects. Personally, my definition of effective is nowhere near 18%. Sadly, that’s modern medicine for you, and the reason many medical reversals exist.
The takeaway from all this is that medical professionals, and public health officials need to stop advertising this vaccine as a next-to perfectly safe product. Unfortunately, due to recent lack of medical transparency, and plummeting vaccine efficacy against a mild variant (Omicron), many people are seeing new data that shows poor vaccinal immunity and they are questioning the reliability of healthcare workers who continue to parade the same message (vaccines are still safe and effective) even in light of contradictory evidence. Now that new science reveals substantially reduced vaccine effectiveness for many cohorts, robust protection from natural infection, that a brush with Omicron is mild at best, and the fact most people are now protected against severe disease and death from realized or unrealized symptomatic & asymptomatic infection + vaccination, they are no longer willing to deal with the potential side effects from the covid shot. All and all, public health officials need to be more open and honest with people about vaccines before, or if ever, trust is rebuilt. It goes without saying, all this will take a long time to fix.
LETS CONNECT:
For many of us, the industry of "health care" is oxymoronic and has been for decades and eons. The officials of said industry have been for sale for as long as there have been dollars to buy them, and the need to pay them for endorsements of dangerous, life threatening products. If given plausible deniability, most Docs are gonna take the check and worry about the "science" after the last check clears. "More Doctors smoke Camel than any other brand!" leads to "Well, at the time, we didn't know WITH CERTAINTY that smoking was bad for you. Sorry."
The only difference between "Have a smoke, you'll feel better" and "Have a vax or two, you'll live longer" is scale.